The High Court of Kenya recently handed down a decision that reinforces the role of courts to protect the constitution against executive overreaches. To constitutional lawyers and academics, the decision is a triumph for constitutionalism and the rule of law. In this piece, we discuss lessons that may be drawn from the decision for constitutional consolidation (or amendment) and the role of courts in South Sudan. One lesson is that courts, as custodians of the constitution, must be on guard at all times to ensure the Executive implements the constitution in accordance with its terms, including constitutional amendments. This requires courts’ courage (in addition to maintaining their independence) to avoid pandering to the Executive. This is one practical, if not the only, way to protect constitutionalism and enforce the rule of law in this emerging state.
repository
Continue to search the repository
You might also like
Pages
- About Our County Profiles
- Blog
- Case Studies Grid
- Central Equatoria
- Conflict Sensitivity Resource Facility South Sudan
- Contact Us
- Contribute a Repository Article
- County Profile HTML links
- County Profiles
- COVID-19 HUB
- Covid-19 information page
- CSRF About Us
- CSRF Helpdesk
- CSRF Helpdesk Form
- CSRF Login
- Dashboard
- Deliverables
- Demo
- Events
- Forgot password
- Guides, Tools and Checklists
- Helpdesk
- Home
- Latest
- Looker Studio
- Subscribe
Categories
Archive
- July 2025
- May 2025
- March 2025
- August 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- December 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- July 2022
- June 2022
- June 2021
- April 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
